The Richfield Township Trustee Meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm on November 25, 2002.

Roll Call: Trustees: Present – Shano Cica-Mraz, Robert Hooper
Absent – Laurie Gilmore
Clerk/Treasurer: Mark Uhrich

Others present: Laurie Pinney, Zoning Inspector

Ms. Cica-Mraz made a motion to approve the November 4, 2002 Regular Trustee meeting minutes and the November 14 Special meeting minutes seconded by Mr. Hooper; Ms. Gilmore – Absent, Mr. Hooper – Yes, Ms. Mraz – Yes, motion carried by majority.

Ms. Cica-Mraz made a motion to approve warrant report 7342 to 7405 seconded by Mr. Hooper; Ms. Gilmore – Absent, Mr. Hooper – Yes, Ms. Mraz – Yes, motion carried by majority.

Mr. Uhrich told the Trustees that he would not be available to attend the next regularly scheduled Trustee meeting on December 9, 2002. He asked the Trustees to consider approving and setting a temporary 2003 appropriation motion at the next meeting.

Ms. Pinney presented the Zoning report – It is the intention of the developer of Glencairn to go back to the June 2001 approved final subdivision plan. Summit County continued the hearing on this matter until December 6, 2002 due to the lack of a quorum. The Zoning Commission's Public Hearing on this matter will be continued to the December 12 meeting.

The next BZA meeting is set for December 16, 2002 and the Zoning Commission meeting is set for December 12, 2002.

Ms. Mraz – There are two, five year terms of service coming up, one each on the Zoning Commission Board and the Board of Zoning Appeals. Plus, there is an alternate position open for each board. Please submit your letter of interest by December 30, 2002 to the Richfield Township office. Also, there is one, three year, Board of Rising Valley Park position open.

Ms. Mraz - The hunting season is upon us and as a reminder to everybody, township residents can discharge guns on their property. This may be annoying to other residents but there is not much the Township can do. The Police Department can check into occurrences, but if the property owner is safely discharging the weapons, then nothing can be done to stop it. The Township cannot limit or specify the time a gun can or cannot be discharged.

Mr. Ken Bennett, 5150 Hecker, Is there any nuisance laws that we can enforce, such as some playing loud music, can we apply the same to gun shots?

Ms. Mraz – No.

Mr. Charles Brinkman, 3400 Robert Burns Drive, Can Biggar make adjustments to the area zoned for cluster homes? I see Ryan Homes purchased the property on the South West corner of Wheatley and Revere roads.

Ms. Pinney – Only if it still complies with the overall approved plan. The property you are referencing is in the Village.

Mr. Brinkman – As of 3:58 p.m. on Friday November 22, the property in question is still listed under Innovative Contractors. There does not appear to be any transfer back to Glencairn.

Ms. Pinney – The plat is in Biggar’s name.

Ms. Mraz – Before we get any further on Glencairn, we want to hear from J & J Refuse Company. The Township and Village just completed the bidding process for the communities’ trash hauling service and J & J is the low bidder and has made the final effort to come here to answer our questions.

Representatives from J & J are John Lehlbach, Scott Walter, and Wayne Fennimore.

Mr. Walter – J & J is part of a 50 year old business family of the Kimble’s. We have a landfill permit and space to operate for the 85 years. We operate 120 trucks with trash and recycle hauling.

Mr. Fennimore – First we plan to route your community then start our collection.

Ms. Mraz – How do you handle complaints of trash blowing around after the truck picks it up?

Mr. Fennimore – We have different trucks then the current hauler, so that may make a difference. Also, we offer the use of a 90 gallon trash can that would minimize animal attacks. We pay our employees hourly with performance bonuses. We teach our drivers to be well disciplined and take care of their route.

Ms. Mraz – How do we know that the recyclables are getting recycled? Where will our trucks come from?

Mr. Fennimore – We process all recyclables at our Canton facility. Richfield will get its trucks from the Canton facility.

Mr. William Demas, 3290 Gullane Drive, When is the best time to put out the trash?

Mr. Fennimore – We ask that the trash be out by 7:00 a.m.

Ms. Brenda Conroy, 3455 Robert Burns Drive, Sometimes our current hauler picks up the recyclables with the trash.

Mr. Fennimore – We won’t do that. Richfield may choose to do the recyclable program every other week instead of weekly. This usually increases participation. Also, we do not want to get in trouble with the EPA. We have separate trucks and sorting facilities.

Mr. Hooper – What do most communities you contract with do, weekly or every other week?

Mr. Fennimore – It depends; we have found that participation and set out rate are higher if done every other week.

Mr. Dave Dickens, 3400 East Glencoe - I live in a community in Florida that requires mandatory recycling. If we are serious about recycling, we should make it mandatory.

Ms. Mraz – Thanks for questions and thanks to J & J for coming to our meeting. We are going to move on to the Glencairn report.

Ms. Pinney – I received notice that the Summit County Planning Commission (SCPC) was to review this matter at their November 22 meeting. However, not enough members were in attendance to hear this matter. So the Glencairn matter is rescheduled for SCPC on December 6, 2002.

Ms. Mraz – The applicants have not been present at the last two meetings. We recently have received nothing in writing from the applicants. Therefore, we are going to discontinue this matter. Glencairn has filed a motion with Summit County Common Pleas court to reverse the BZA’s findings and is apparently going straight to the SCPC. The Zoning Commission cannot continue their Public Hearing without the Trustees comments on this matter, I see no reason why the Zoning Commission would continue this matter. The Glencairn residents should go to the SCPC hearing. The Township needs to verify some of the green space calculations that Glencairn has given us as well as proceeding with compliance with our stated issues on the alterations to the development plan requested.

Ms. Mraz made motion to recommend to the Zoning Commission to deny the Glencairn proposal based on the single entity control issue and questions regarding the green space, seconded by Mr. Hooper; Ms. Gilmore – Absent, Mr. Hooper – Yes, Ms. Mraz – Yes, motion carried by majority.

Mr. Charles Brinkman, 3400 Robert Burns Drive, There have been land deed transfers from Glencairn back to Glencairn. Are they changing the plan to adjust the number of single family homes? They are transferring without recording the deed.

Ms. Mraz – We can only control and focus on the area that relates to the zoning. The Glencairn residents need to keep up on these areas that do not relate to the zoning matters of Richfield Township.

Mr. Mike Caporale, 3367 Revere, Can SCPC overturn the Trustees decision?

Ms. Mraz – In order to reach a decision, the Zoning Commission was seeking the Trustee’s opinion and comments on this matter. We just issued our opinion. The applicant could file for a variance.

Ms. Pinney – Without township approval it would not go forward to the SCPC.

Mr. Slagter, Richfield Township legal counsel, The Township approved the alterations to the plan in June 2001. Then it came to our attention that Glencairn was not the developer of the Turnberry phase. The Zoning Commission came to the Trustees for an opinion on this matter. As a practical matter the new developer met the density and size requirements, but it appeared that the single entity control issue was not followed. The final plat approval was given directly to SCPC passing by the township, and the SCPC cannot approve this without Richfield’s zoning approval.

Mr. Caporale – They do not need approval if everything was the way it was in June 2001?

Ms. Mraz & Ms. Pinney – Yes.

Mr. Caporale –What about the one acre lots behind Robert Burns, can they change those from single family housing?

Ms. Pinney – No, they must come back to the Township for any changes.

Mr. Dickens – The R-4 district was created in 1994, can we change the code to ensure he meets the original intent of the code?

Ms. Mraz – The only R-4 district is the Glencairn development. We could not go back and modify the code and force Glencairn to comply with a new set of regulations.

Mr. Brinkman – The definitions in HUD require consistency and if a price point is demonstrated then a second price point that is created may create a second class of homeowners.

Mr. Demas – What board openings are available?

Ms. Mraz – One each for the Zoning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals.

Mr. Caporale – Can Mr. Biggar stop putting in the second access road?

Ms. Pinney – No.

Mr. Caporale – As homeowners we should know how many single family and cluster homes he is going to construct. It affects our re-sale price. What can he do without trustee approval?

Ms. Mraz – He has the ability to make changes in certain phases as long as the ratio of single family homes does not drop below the approved plan, certain percentage of green space is maintained, minimum setbacks are kept, etc.

Ms. Conroy, How do we enforce the cluster home restrictions?

Ms. Pinney – The way the code was written we cannot regulate the setbacks on cluster homes or accessory buildings, so if they want to put an above ground pool up, they can.

Ms. Conroy – The character of the community is ruined by some of these changes.

Ms. Mraz – There are many land use issues we cannot regulate, we need to keep our eye out for this type of activity and do our best to control them.

Mr. Slagter – When there is a zoning code in place we have standards of review, but the Township cannot regulate who builds.

Ms. Mraz made a motion to enter in to executive session at 9:10 p.m. to discuss a pending legal matter seconded by Mr. Hooper; Ms. Gilmore – Absent, Mr. Hooper – Yes, Ms. Mraz – Yes, motion carried by majority.

Ms. Mraz made a motion to end the executive session at 9:50 p.m., seconded by Mr. Hooper; Ms. Gilmore – Absent, Mr. Hooper – Yes, Ms. Mraz – Yes, motion carried by majority.

Ms. Mraz made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 9:50 p.m. seconded by Mr. Hooper; Ms. Gilmore – Absent, Mr. Hooper – Yes, Ms. Mraz – Yes, motion carried by majority.

_______________________ _________________________
Chairwoman Clerk

This page last updated on: 02/25/2006
Return to November Minutes